![]() I need to do something else for a while”, which is another marker that the wait for a third film is going to be longer than expected. Read on.Īsked on the possibility of a third ‘Incredibles’ film and the possible timeline for it, director Brad Bird said that “it’s like, the last thing you want to do after swimming in the ocean for a month is go for a swim. More on this and possible plot points as we move forward. With Disney stating officially that original movies would be the way to go for them after ‘Toy Story 4’, at least in this faction (Pixar), a new Incredibles film seems highly unlikely anytime soon. I say this because the chances of a sequel while most of you are still in your primes seem exasperatingly low, and neither Disney nor Pixar seem in any hurry to pick this up, even if their focus in recent times seems to have shifted from original properties to remakes and sequels, something that they will hope to combat with the upcoming ‘Soul’ and ‘Onward’, two Pixar movies that I am vastly, vastly hopeful about. Malkovich is often seen onscreen with himself in this movie, but I never noticed any seams or glitches, and I was also quietly grateful to Seidelman for not providing any moments that were intended merely to exploit the trick.This franchise is special, there is no denying that, and the fantastic medium that is animation just ensures that the movies live on with the same characters, no matter the time. Right," we see a theater marquee in the background advertising " The Parent Trap." That was, of course, the movie where Hayley Mills played twins, thanks to trick photography. You may remember him as the smarmy, sweating porno store operator in " 52 Pick-Up." The distance between these two good performances is impressive.Īt one point in "Making Mr. Seidelman also has fun populating the outskirts of her plot with good character actors, especially Robert Trebor as the tuxedo salesman. It makes all the difference in the world. ![]() Right," there are scenes where the scientist and the android are mistaken for one another, and Seidelman uses the misunderstandings to make comic points about the personalities of her characters: They make wrong assumptions because of who they are, instead of because of how stupid they are. "Secret" has lots of moments when characters don't realize exactly who they're talking to, and it creates those moments out of the stupidity of the characters. Seeing the two movies in the same week is instructive because they take such different approaches to the challenge of identity. With this film, she hits her stride as a comedy director who would rather be clever than obvious, who allows good actors such as Malkovich to go for quiet effects rather than broad, dumb cliches.Īlso around right now is " The Secret of My Success," another comedy depending on dual and mistaken identities. Right" was directed by Susan Seidelman, whose previous credits are "Smithereens," which I didn't much like, and " Desperately Seeking Susan," which was much more assured. She has an instantly combative relationship with the scientist who invented the android, and it's made trickier because as the android grows more human, the scientist subtly grows more robotic. Magnuson is fun, too, with her high heels and designer outfits, clipboards and speculative looks. Like Jeff Bridges in " Starman," he's able to meet the tricky challenge of moving in an uncoordinated way without looking merely ridiculous. Malkovich provides just the right amount of inept clumsiness for the android, which sometimes has trouble getting its mind-body coordination in line. That's true, for example, during the sweet, tentative moments when the android begins to fall for the woman.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |